logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2018.02.09 2017고단305
도로교통법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding three hundred thousand won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. He/she shall be prohibited from operating any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation;

Nevertheless, on October 18, 2017, the Defendant driven Dunst Pacific Freight Vehicles not covered by mandatory insurance at a section of about 300 meters from the front of the train station, which was located in the border border border border around 20:10 to the national highway No. 88 of the same military sector, from around 300 meters.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving cars of Drocketing traffic vehicles.

On October 18, 2017, from around 19:30 to 20:00, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was in the vicinity of the said train while drinking the squad soldier, followed up approximately 60 km of the national highway C prior to the aforementioned nutrition group by the F police box at the Myeon of E at the Myeon of the seat of E.

Since there are many commercial buildings in the vicinity and parking vehicles on the side, in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to live well and safely drive the vehicle.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the Defendant was negligent in neglecting his duty to care and did not properly look at the front, the part of the Defendant’s H Poter freight behind the Defendant’s Habter was found to have been on the front of the freight truck for the Defendant’s operation.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not report the place of the accident, the goods damaged, and the degree of damage, etc. in the nearest police box, etc., even though the Defendant, by negligence as above, destroyed the cargo loaded by the injured person, such as loading the cargo loaded on the back, exchange of the cargo, etc.

3. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) was committed by the Defendant while driving alcohol under the influence of alcohol as above at the time of the day set forth in paragraph (2) of the same Article, resulting in an accident while leaving the scene as it is, and was discovered by the police officer I, etc. who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a 112 report, and led to voluntary accompanying of the Defendant to the F police box.

After the same day, the defendant is 20.

arrow