The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Do-owned Do-owned Do-owned Do-owned car volume.

피고인은 2015. 11. 12. 08:20 경 위 승용차를 운전하여 광주 서구 마륵동에 있는 삼성전자서비스 뒤 사거리를 스카이 주유소 쪽에서 한 신 휴 플러스 쪽으로 편도 2 차로 중 1 차로를 이용 시속 미상의 속도로 진행하게 되었다.

At this point, it is a private-distance intersection where signal lights are not installed.

In such cases, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by checking the safety of the front section, the left section, and the well, and conducting temporary suspension.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeded on the left side of the road, and the part of the FOtob, which is driven by the victim E (55) who is driving on the left side of the road, conflicts with the front part of the vehicle driven by the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim due to the above occupational negligence during approximately 16 weeks of pulver pulver pulver pulver pulver pulvers (insulvers pulvers pulvers pulvers pulvers pulvers extended to damp culvers)

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

The records reveal that the victim explicitly expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant on May 11, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.