1. Of the judgment of the first instance court against Defendant M and P, the part against the Plaintiff, which orders payment under the following.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and Defendant D, G, J, M, P, S, and VI (hereinafter “Defendant students”) were students in the same school year as the Plaintiff and Defendant D, G, J, M, P, S, and the third grade of the same school around 201 and around 2012 (Defendant J transferred to the second grade of each of the above schools as of May 2, 201 and Defendant S transferred to the second grade of each of the above schools as of October 2, 201.

(2) Meanwhile, Defendant E and F are the parents of Defendant D, ② the parents of Defendant H and I, ③ the parents of Defendant K and L, the parents of Defendant J, ④ the parents of Defendant N andO, ⑤ the parents of Defendant Q and R, the parents of Defendant P, and the parents of Defendant Q and U, and the parents of Defendant Q and R, 6 the parents of Defendant S, 7 Defendant W and X.

B. On March 2012, the Plaintiff did not attend the school on the basis of the school’s investigation as to the harassment of the Plaintiff. In this regard, the Plaintiff’s parents and three villages demanded that the Plaintiff “Defendant students have continuously bullying and bullying with the Plaintiff in group since April 201.” 2) Y middle school heard the Plaintiff’s statement by the Plaintiff and its parents, the Defendant students identified as the aggressor students, the Defendant students, and the Plaintiff’s parents, and the Plaintiff’s parents, etc., and held the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence on April 20, 2012.

At the time, the Y Middle School collected only the facts confirmed except for the cases denied by the Defendant students, among the facts of damage claimed by the Plaintiff’s parents, and organized them into “aggressive student’s statement,” and the details are as shown in the attached Form.

3) As a result of deliberation on the basis of the results of the investigation, the above autonomous committee decided on ① the measures of “in writing books and the prohibition of contact between Defendant M and P on the ground of “spopic harassment,” and ② the remaining Defendant students decided on the measures of “copical and written books,” respectively. On April 23, 2012, the Y Middle School notified Defendant M and P of the said measures. 4) The Plaintiff’s mother C was insufficient to take measures against the Defendant students.