beta
Text
1. The defendant is innocent. 2. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
Reasons
1. Around December 2014, the Defendant: (a) decided to sell the entire land in the name of the victim C and the Defendant’s fathered D to the victim; and (b) around January 22, 2015, the Defendant sent a phone call to the victim at the G office located in the G office located in the G office located in the YUF of the YUE and the Defendant’s fathered to the victim; and (c) on January 22, 2015, the Defendant sent a phone to the victim, and “a sales contract for the E land was prepared, and a seal stamp is affixed to deposit money.”
However, in fact, the Defendant stated the E-land in the above D name as H 1,339 square meters, I 529 square meters, J 1,779 square meters, K prior to 307 square meters, and L’s indictment as “P” but appears to be a clerical error.
Using the fact that the victim is a total of 10 square meters of the previous 10 square meters and M 1,924 square meters, and the victim is not accurately aware of the parcel number, only 4 other than the two parcels, such as H 1,339 square meters and I 529 square meters, among the above land, was entered in the sales contract only, and there was no intention to sell all the above six parcels.
Therefore, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 18 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account NumberO) in the name of the Defendant N.
2. According to the records of basic facts, the following facts are recognized:
[Attachment 1,339§³ 2 m3,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,00
A. The following parcels of land (hereinafter “instant six parcels of land”; the land Nos. 1, 2 among them was owned by “the instant two parcels of land”; and the land Nos. 3 and 6, as indicated below, was owned by the Defendant’s father network D, and was succeeded to the inheritor’s death on December 15, 1968.
B. N (the Defendant’s wife and the Defendant’s mother) who solely completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the instant four parcels of land due to a consultation division, is the land of this case between C and C on January 22, 2015.