logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.10.04 2016나55740
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. All of the plaintiff's claims expanded by this court are dismissed.

3...

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts in this court are as follows: the "2.24, 2004.2.2.24, 2004.2.2.2.2.24, 2004.2.2.2.2004.2.2.2.2004.2.2.2.2008." 4.2.3.2.3.2. 4.2. the reason why the court stated this part is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Determination

A. The gist of the plaintiff's assertion 1) The reasons why the court should explain this part of the claim are as follows: "the plaintiff's 6th of the judgment of the court of first instance" was deleted; "the surveying result map" in the 7th of the judgment; "the surveying result map" in the 8th of the judgment; "the 20th of the judgment" through "the surveying result map" in the 8th of the judgment; and "the 2th of the 8th of the judgment" in the 2nd of the 2nd of the 20th of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 204th of the 204th of the 2nd of the 1st of the 204th of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 1st of the 1st of the 2004th of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 1st of the 20th of the 1st of the 2nd of the 1st of the surveying.

arrow