logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.04.24 2012고정5803
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 23, 2011, at around 22:10, the Defendant was under control by the victim D (the age of 64) who was working for traffic assistance service while driving CMW car at the Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and going to the station of the Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul, the New York Islands and the CMW car from the CM car at the Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and turned to the left-hand turn from the parallel of the route to the station of the station of the Seoul, the Defendant was under control.

The Defendant, in mind of having the victim set the end portion of the main set before the vehicle so that the victim can not turn to the left, proceeded to the right side of the said vehicle, and had the victim go beyond the main set of the said vehicle, and had the victim go to the right side of the said vehicle, and had the victim go to the body of the victim, and caused the victim's injury, such as the left kne part and the kne part of the victim's left side, resulting in the victim's injury to the left part for about 10 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Partial statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entries in a written injury diagnosis;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion under Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse

1. The Defendant claimed that the Defendant avoided the victim and proceeded with the car, but the victim was going to go on the set of the car and did not inflict an injury on the victim by driving the car.

2. In full view of the fact that the victim made a statement that the defendant's driver's car in the street has been driving a car in the future by the defendant, the victim was forced to go on the part of the main set, and the defendant went into the main set, and knee was injured (see, e.g., Investigation Records No. 19) at the time, E also states that the defendant was sealed by the preceding knee with the victim and stated that the defendant was pushed the victim in a car, the defendant's argument is without merit. Thus, the defendant's argument is without merit.

arrow