logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원동부지원 2016.10.27 2016가단4404
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a person who operates a restaurant in accordance with 101 of Busan Shipping Daegu C shopping mall (hereinafter “instant shopping mall”), and the Defendant is a person who operates a laundry in accordance with 103 of the instant shopping mall.

From January 10, 2016, the Plaintiff suffered symptoms, such as sheshel, head and chest pain, and respiratory distress. Ultimately, around August 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as abandoned farming at Busan National University Hospital.

Since these diseases are caused by chemical substances in a laundry room operated by the Defendant, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff a total of KRW 3,000,000,000 from March 2016 to August 2016, including medical expenses and transportation expenses, and KRW 24,00,000 from March 2016 to August 2016.

2. According to the evidence Nos. 15 and 16, it is recognized that the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Busan National University Hospital.

In light of the following circumstances that can be seen by comprehensively considering whether the above disease was caused by the chemicals discharged by the Defendant in the laundry room operated by the Defendant, Eul evidence Nos. 1, and fact-finding with the Maritime Daegu Office on January 20, 2016, the Maritime Daegu Office conducted on the site inspection of the laundry room operated by the Defendant on January 20, 2016, and as a result, it was confirmed that there was no violation of the standards for facilities of the laundry business operator under the Public Health Control Act, it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff’s disease was caused by the chemicals discharged by the Defendant in the laundry room operated by the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow