logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.09.10 2018고정348
특수협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a driver of the D Route Bus belonging to C Company B.

Around 16:20 March 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven the above bus on the street in front of the F convenience point in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, along the two-lanes of the city telephone station in the vicinity of the G market; and (b) changed the course to one lane after passengers getting off the bus at the bus stop; and (c) made it possible for the victim H drivers to face with the taxi in the first lane, and stopped in a large line over about 10 seconds; (d) obstructed the passage of the above taxi, and (e) obstructed the passage of the said taxi in the first lane and the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two-lane of the two.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. The taxi booms video CDs, bus booms video CDs;

1. Blue images of black stuffs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (the result of the analysis of black stay images);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 284 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In full view of the results of the reproduction of taxi booms video CDs and bus booms video CDs with reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, considering various sentencing conditions, including the fact that the Defendant denies the instant crime even though the facts charged were fully recognized that the Defendant threatened the victim by bus.

arrow