logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2019.08.23 2019나11
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff and Plaintiff for Review)’s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff, and Plaintiff for reexamination).

Reasons

1. The defendant's ground for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows the materials submitted in this court, the fact-finding and the judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. As such, the defendant's lawsuit of retrial of this case is unlawful and dismissed.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow