logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.20 2015나35583
소유권이전등기말소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in cases where a letter Nos. 3, 8, and 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

"A. Determination No. 16-1 through 9, No. 5, No. 6, No. 25, No. 26, No. 27-1 through No. 30, and No. 1 through No. 30, the Plaintiff’s creditor filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking cancellation of the ownership transfer registration on the land and building in Suwon District Court Sung-nam as No. 98Da27196, Jun. 14, 200, taking into account the following facts: (i) the Plaintiff’s testimony and evidence No. 16-1 to No. 5, No. 25, No. 265, No. 27, and No. 30-1 to No. 30; and (ii) the Plaintiff’s appeal against the Defendant’s 200-Ma1383, Jun. 14, 200; (iii) the Plaintiff was present at the appellate court and reported to the Seoul District Court’s testimony on the land and building in his name.

arrow