A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 13, 2018, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) with C, a company partner, provided that from around 19:45 on March 13, 2018 to 21:10 on the same day, the Defendant provided alcohol to E, along with the entertainment receptionist at the E station located in Busan Northern-gu, Busan, with the entertainment receptionist, and the Defendant provided money to the victim F (the age of 71) who is the head of the business requiring that the Defendant pay an entertainment receptionist amount of KRW 25,000.

Our country (the entertainment receptionist and entertainment receptionist) has conducted sexual traffic.

I see how to report 112.

It threatens “A”, and the above C shall photograph the business permit kept in the main store of a mobile phone and shall make a report to the Gu office and the police to close the door.

“The threat was made”.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collaboration with the above C (a summary indictment on the same day), attempted to have the victim waive his/her claim for the value of drinking, but the Defendant failed to comply with it, thereby having attempted to commit an attempted crime.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above time, place, and 112 reported, and notified the Defendant of the fact that there was no evidence to verify and control the details of the report and the existence of evidence of the act of arranging sexual traffic, but the Defendant continued to assert sexual traffic and refused to pay the drinking value, and entered the personal information of the Defendant and the above C in the work pocket book in order to identify the personal information of the Defendant, and the Defendant cut down the work pocket book of Ha with his hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted as above and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of H’s 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Articles 6 and 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Articles 350(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Article 37 of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes Act.