logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.11.13 2018고정1075
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall lend any access medium used for electronic financial transactions while receiving, demanding or promising the payment.

Nevertheless, on June 20, 2018, the defendant is the head of the team who works in Chinese raw materials export and import enterprises.

At around 14:00 of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the same day, he/she received the call that he/she will grant one million won per week to the Kwikseter service articles who sent the name of the person who was not the person who was not the person in question, with the three head of the physical card and the password, which are linked to each of the defendant's Saemaul Treasury Account (Account Number C), Suhyup Bank Account (Account Number D), Enterprise Bank Account (Account Number E), and Enterprise Bank Account (Account Number E), respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement and a receipt for deposit;

1. A certificate of the details of each member account, inquiry of the details of transactions, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the transaction list by account;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the detention of the Nowon-gu Station shall not only harm the trust and safety of financial transactions, but also allow access media leased from the crime to be used for various criminal acts. Thus, the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak, and the defendant has no record of being subject to criminal punishment for the same crime at the trial of this case, by taking into account the sentencing conditions set forth in the trial of this case, such as the fact that the crime of this case

arrow