1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On March 11, 2005, while serving as a security guard of B apartment units from March 2, 2015, the Plaintiff was used around 14:00 on March 2, 2015, and was transferred to a Gacheon-si Hospital via the Gacheon-dong Hospital and was diagnosed as “cerebrovascular and cerebrovascular (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

On April 14, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that there was a proximate causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s work and the instant injury and disease, and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant. However, on June 8, 2015, the Defendant issued a medical care non-approval disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that there was no proximate causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s work and the instant injury and disease.

On September 4, 2015, the Plaintiff, who was dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but was dismissed on October 16, 2015.

[Based on recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, and the purport of the entire argument as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case, the plaintiff asserted that the disposition of this case was lawful, and the plaintiff sent to the division where 66 hours and 30 minutes work average per week, while working for 24 hours a day-off system. The amount of recycled over 110 minutes per week average due to snow-off leave was increased by additional collection and removal. On the date of the disaster of this case, the amount of recycled over 2 times and 110 minutes average due to snow-off leave was increased by 5 days prior to the occurrence of the disaster of this case, and was subject to serious stress, such as personal insult

In addition, since the blocking of the entrance of apartment installed in the front door of the plaintiff's work is far away from the opposite direction of apartment in the guard room, the plaintiff as the plaintiff is required to check out each time when the visiting vehicle enters the room, so the physical passage and stress of the plaintiff has increased.

In addition, the plaintiff has been making efforts to manage the health, such as taking the blood pressure regularly and paralleling the food law.

In light of these circumstances, the injury or disease of this case occurred due to physical or mental division in the course of business or in the course of business.