Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 11:30 on April 20, 2014, the Defendant her flocked to 786 in the subway station located in Busan East Eastdong, and her flickly flocked to her horses from the victim C (the age of 71) as her flick flick. The Defendant her flickly flickly flicked to her horses, and her flickly flickly flickly flickly flicked from the victim, and her flickly flickly flicked from the victim, and her flickly flicked the victim’s face, and her flickly damaged the victim’s blick flick that requires two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. A report on investigation (investigative records No. 19 pages);

1. Investigation report (to listen to the statement in the D phone from a shote);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a certificate of injury, or photographic part of injury;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of the provisional payment order constituted legitimate self-defense, since they were only defensive acts in the course of assault by the victim.

However, according to the evidence of the judgment, the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact of assaulting the victim as stated in the judgment as the intention of attacking the victim first while he/she was in a verbal dispute with the victim, and it is difficult to view it as self-defense, and thus, we cannot accept the above assertion