logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2012.11.08 2012고합218
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. On June 11, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00, driven a vehicle with approximately 10k section from the front of the D cafeteria located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongbuk-gun to the roads near the same military-style pentin apartment, thereby under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.205%.

2. Determination

A. In this court, the Defendant was found to have been drunk in the above vehicle in the condition of being drunk on the roads near the above Chungcheong apartment located in the area of the Haak-gun, the Defendant did not drive the instant vehicle, but the person who driven the instant vehicle was F at the time, but was the Defendant at the time, but was the Defendant, but was the Defendant, at the time of the investigation at the G police box, was was the Defendant, and the husband was soon suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol and stated that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol without disclosing the existence of the said F at the time of the investigation at the G police box, and later, the Defendant stated that the Defendant continued to have been convicted of the instant crime by asserting that he had been convicted of the Defendant’s wife.

B. First, the main evidence of the instant crime lies in the Defendant’s report on the detection of the driver, the report on the situation of the driver, the record of the police preparation, the police interrogation protocol against the Defendant, the Defendant’s prosecutor’s statement, etc.

However, as long as the defendant denies the contents of the police interrogation protocol against the defendant in this court, its admissibility is not admissible.

Next, according to the defendant's prosecutorial statement that the defendant consented, the defendant all of the facts charged of this case is admitted, and the defendant made a statement that seems to be consistent with the facts charged to the effect that he will be able to see that he will drink at the Dcafeteria on the same day of this case, she will be placed on the road near the Gain Apartment apartment in the Gasan-si and wait for the former husband while coming from his house.

However, the defendant's above.

arrow