logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.03.23 2016고정22
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the actual representative of the Daejeon Seo-gu and 1613 C Co., Ltd., who runs a construction business in the Gwangju Seo-gu.

Where a construction business has been carried out two or more times of a contract referred to in subparagraph 11 of Article 2 of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry, and a sewage supplier who is not a constructor has failed to pay wages to his/her workers, the immediate upper-tier supplier shall be jointly and severally liable with a sewage supplier for the wages of the workers employed by a sewage supplier.

Nevertheless, as the Defendant did not pay the above amount of KRW 2,100,000 in the wage balance of the above D at the above construction site, the Defendant did not pay the wages jointly and severally with E.

2. Article 109(1) and Article 44-2 of the Labor Standards Act applicable to the facts charged of judgment: A judgment dismissing a victim’s non-prosecution of intent on March 18, 2016, which was after the institution of public prosecution under Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)

arrow