logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.06.18 2014노2748
건조물침입
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The defendant asserts that although the defendant did not have entered the C building 303 managed by the victim, the judgment of the court below that the defendant invadedd the C building 303 without permission, there is an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The Defendant asserts that the sentence imposed by the lower court (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. On November 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) knew that, around 4:0 p.m. on Nov. 6, 2013, the entrance was not corrected at the place where the Victim D (40 years of age) set up a charter to a licensed real estate agent’s office and the entrance was not corrected; (b) entered tobacco without the victim’s consent against the victim’s will; and (c) intruded into the room managed by the victim, such as smoking, smoking, drinking, using the valley, and living in the toilet.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by compiling the evidence as indicated in its judgment.

C. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the victim was put in a licensed real estate agent office before two months from the date of the occurrence of the case, and 303 of the building C was under management from that time, without correction. ② The victim was under contact with the investigation agency to the effect that he was living in the building C by a licensed real estate agent on the day of the case, and 303 of the building C from that time to the court of the court below. The defendant tried to verify his personal identity in the stairs distance from the stairs between the third and fourth floors of the building C, but failed to respond properly, and transferred the building C to the police officer immediately after the victim attempted to flee. ③ The defendant reported the original rent advertisements and stated the terms and conditions of lease by telephone, etc., on the day of the case.

arrow