Text
Imprisonment with prison labor for four months and four years for the rest of crimes under paragraph (2) of the judgment of the accused.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On June 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud in the Gwangju District Court's net support, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 1, 2015.
[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 967
1. On August 28, 2014, the Defendant against the victim C stated, “The Defendant would send money directly to the victim C at the time of loading and unloading at the port of loading and unloading a ship of Geumyang-dong product Geumyang-si.” On the part of the victim C, “The Defendant would pay money to the victim C after leaving the account in the house, instead of going through a tax base of, and going to a tax base of, the tax base of annual taxation.”
However, in fact, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the damaged party, because it used it for repayment of other obligations or planned to use it for gambling on the Internet.
The Defendant received 50,000,000 won from the damaged person, namely, from the damaged person to the Agricultural Cooperative (Account Number: E) account in the name of D, from October 1, 2015, a total of 256,35,000 won from the damaged person, including from the time when he/she was transferred from the damaged person to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of D, in total, from October 1, 2015.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
"2017 Highest 1500"
2. Fraud against victim F;
A. From December 15, 2014 to May 12, 2015, the defrauded: (a) the Defendant called “around December 15, 2014, the Defendant called that the Defendant would pay off the amount of the money that was leased to the victim by phoneing the victim at a closed place on December 15, 2014.”
However, in fact, the Defendant had a debt exceeding 100 million won at the time, and even if she borrowed money, he was willing to use it for gambling on the Internet, so even if she borrowed money from the damaged party, she did not have the intent or ability to pay it.
The defendant receives 3,00,000 won from the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number: E) in the name of the defendant for the same day from the damaged person.