logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.01.15 2013고단1729
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From around 1994, while working for C Agricultural Cooperatives, the Defendant used his opportunity to conduct real name verification as an employee, and forged loan-related documents without the Defendant’s consent, and received a loan under the name of D, or the Defendant received a loan from the Defendant, and used the loan by entering D as the mortgagee of the right to collateral security.

1. On January 29, 2007, the Defendant filed an application for a loan of KRW 50 million with the name of the Defendant at the NAMC branch located in Guro-si around January 29, 2007, with the approval of the loan of KRW 50 million, and received KRW 50 million from the Defendant’s agricultural bank account (G) in the name of the Defendant with the approval of the loan of KRW 50 million, by forging a certificate of the scope of collateral obligations under D’s name, and a certificate of collateral security contract.

However, the fact that D did not consent to the establishment of the right to collateral security, and that the defendant forged a certificate of the scope of the secured obligation under the name of D and a certificate of the right to collateral security contract.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, was accused of the Victim C Agricultural Cooperative and was given property from the victim.

2. On October 30, 2007, the Defendant filed an application for a loan of KRW 10 million with the name of NA in the name of NA around October 30, 2007 with the Defendant’s account (G) in the name of 10 million in the name of NA on the same day after forging one copy of the loan transaction agreement in the name of NA and presenting it to the I division of NA in the name of NA. The Defendant obtained approval for a loan of KRW 10 million in the name of NA on the same day.

However, the fact that D did not consent to the above loan, and that the defendant forged the loan transaction agreement in the name of D.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, was accused of the Victim C Agricultural Cooperative and was given property from the victim.

3. The crime on February 29, 2008.

A. On February 29, 2008, the Defendant forged private document documents D. at the CFS branch in the Gumi-si E around February 29, 2008.

arrow