1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 526,298,800 for Plaintiff A, and KRW 105,00,000 for Plaintiff F; and (b) KRW 75,00,00 for Plaintiff E, G, H, I, J, and K respectively.

The summary of the case is that the investigator belonging to the National Security Planning Department (hereinafter referred to as the “State Security Planning Department”) under the Defendant fabricated evidence by illegally arresting and detained the Plaintiff A as a counter-espionage-related suspect, and receiving false confession and statement by committing a serious cruel act, such as rescue, various advisers, intimidation, etc. Even after transfer, the Plaintiff A was involved in the investigation at the prosecution after transfer, and was present during the public trial, thereby creating a psychological fear or pressure that makes it difficult for the Plaintiff A to reveal the truth. The Defendant was sentenced to a final and conclusive sentence of punishment as a result of the cruel act at the stage of the investigation of inside (Judicial Police) investigation to affect the prosecutor’s investigation and the public trial, and the Defendant was subject to considerable physical and mental pain and disadvantage by monitoring the Plaintiff’s family as a counter-espionage’s family member and making it difficult for the Defendant to lead a normal social life with his name covered, and thus, the Plaintiffs sought compensation for consolation money and consolation money by asking the State against the Defendant.

In fact, the degree of kinship between the plaintiffs et al. was created between the deceased E and the network N by the plaintiff F, A, G, H, I, J, and K.

(S) The network N was dead on January 12, 2006, the network M was deceased on around 2008, around 1990, around 190, and around 2008.

Plaintiff

A was married with Plaintiff B on December 17, 1993, and subsequently produced O Plaintiff C and P Plaintiff D.

Plaintiff

The plaintiff A, including the investigation and prosecution against A, participated in the inspection of the Japanese advertising industry conducted by the Korean Advertising Industry Association of Korea, an incorporated association, while operating the "R" in Q Q in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, and stayed in Japan from June 30, 1983 to July 16, 1983, the plaintiff A, including the investigation and prosecution against A, was only in the external third village S, etc., a department of the Korean Federation of Gremans (hereinafter referred to as the "KGT") of Korea during his stay in Japan.

The investigators belonging to Ansan-domination are in custody of the plaintiff A's early training in the Namsan Prison without a warrant on August 12, 1983 when he/she conducted the network L, N, plaintiff A, and F, and detained him/her in the Namsan Prison.