1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts (applicable for recognition: Facts not disputed, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 15 (including provisional numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply);

(i)each entry of evidence of Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

A. On February 198, 1998, the defendant was established for the purpose of creating the E-Japan housing site in the above project district as its members, and the plaintiffs are the members of the defendant.

B. On September 20, 2016, Gwangju District Court’s net support: (a) appointed F as a temporary director exercising the Defendant’s authority to convene a general assembly; and (b) F organized an election commission for the Defendant’s election of executive officers (hereinafter “Defendant First Lieutenant”).

On March 18, 2017, the defendant election commission prepared a list of union members and discussed specific election methods for the election of union members, and decided to hold a general meeting for the election of union members such as the president of the partnership (hereinafter “instant general meeting”).

C. On December 12, 2016, the Defendant’s First Instance held the instant general meeting and publicly announced the registration of candidates for executive officers as an agenda item, such as the election of executive officers, such as the president of the cooperative.

On January 16, 2017, the Defendant’s election commission changed the number of voters by agreement with the executive officers, and made a corrective publication to determine the following methods of election (hereinafter “instant corrective publication”). On January 24, 2017, the Defendant’s election commission issued a corrective publication to determine the number of voters 1,662, excluding the method of advance voting or vote by mail of the union members.

However, the above-determined elector was excluded from Mayang and Korea as a partner.

Correction Publication

7. It shall be deemed that a power of attorney has been delegated to ad hoc director, if the power of attorney is written in the name of the partnership.

8. Effective power of attorney (which was made directly by the Cooperative) and accompanying documentation requirements (1) The power of attorney form shall be valid only for those made and issued by the Cooperative (which shall not be acceptable for writing, facsimile, reproduction, and self-production). (2) The delegating shall be the name of the power of attorney.