A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 22:45 on December 31, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driven a car in Cterac, while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.191 percent of alcohol content, from a section of approximately one kilometer to the roads in front of the oil station in the territory of an exclusive city, from a Do near the short-term market in the city of nuclear power.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.A.) provided that the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with the above test section by driving it from the time bordering as set forth in paragraph 1, and tried to turn off the shooting distance in front of the oil station in front of the above zero-day apartment from the

In such a case, although the Defendant, who is engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle, has a duty of care to make a safe round without adequately operating the steering gear and brakes and not harming the vehicle, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting this, and the Defendant was negligent in neglecting to properly operate the steering gear and brakes as set forth in paragraph (1) and by neglecting to drive the steering gear and brakes, thereby driving E-line of the victim D (n, 36 years old) who was trying to drive the steering distance in front of the oil station in front of the oil station at the right angle on the right side of the road, while driving the motor vehicle at the front of the motor vehicle in the above table.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood, which requires medical treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, did not immediately stop the victim, and take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though the Defendant destroyed the above Rad car, thereby causing the victim to have the repair cost of KRW 9,206,296.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. A report on detection of a host driver, a written estimate (E), and a written diagnosis (No. 4, 15, and 18 No. 18);

1. The actual survey report, on-site photographs, investigation reports (Evidence No. 2, 3, 11) (Evidence List No. 2, 3, 11).