beta
Text
Defendant
A, B, and D are punished by a fine of 14,400,000 won, and the defendant C and the E Customs Service Office are punished by a fine of 9.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A was a director of the company D, and Defendant B was the representative director of the above company. Defendant C was working at the Gun Office, the E-F, the E-F, the E-F, the Korea Customs Service Act, the Korea Customs Service Act, the Korea Customs Service Act, the Korea Customs Service Act, and Defendant D is a company for the purpose of exporting and importing agricultural, fishery, and livestock products located in Guri-si I, and Defendant E-F, the E-F office is a corporation for the purpose of filing an import declaration of goods located in the GunJ.
1. Although Defendant A, B, and C are accurately reported the name, size, quantity, price, etc. of the pertinent goods to be imported, Defendant A, B, and C, when Defendant C imported the domestic vegetation from China LINYYIK UNFCCC LTD, the Chinese occupation of China was designated as the goods subject to the prior tax examination to prevent low price declaration at a high rate of 377.3%, and it was anticipated that customs clearance is difficult due to the precise examination, repair prior to the removal of the customs value, etc., and, when the aforementioned goods are selected as the goods subject to prior tax examination, the customs clearance was offered to avoid the prior tax examination by means of either raising freight rates, etc. from the actual freight invoice (INVOE) or falsely reporting freight rates, etc. to the customs office by means of avoiding the prior tax examination.
(On the other hand, the prosecutor brought a public action against the Defendants to refund customs duties paid in excess after the vehicle, but the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize them). On March 26, 2009, the Defendants filed an import declaration with the head of the Gun/U.S. customs office located in the 49-38 Si/U.S., Si/Gun/Gu on March 26, 2009, on the 30th day of the same month, the purchase price was reported to 221 ton and the actual freight was 950.