logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.07.09 2015재고합29
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 16, 1998, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul District Court on August 16, 1998; one year and six months; one year and six months; one year and six months; one year and six months; one year and six months; and one year and six months.

After that, on September 17, 2008, the Seoul East Eastern District Court sentenced three years of imprisonment for the same crime, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on July 22, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

Around 04:41 on October 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) deemed the victim D was under the influence of alcohol in a parking lot located in the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office Officetel; (b) reported that the victim D was locked at ordinary level; and (c) opened a bank in which the victim was locked, and then cut off the victim’s cash amounting to KRW 90,000,000 in cash, KRW 50,000 in cash, KRW 90,000 in cash, and KRW 50,000 in cash, KRW 50,000 in the market price, including the modern card, and KRW 1,00,000 in the modern card, and KRW 1,000 in the market price of the victim’s left part, and then cut off the victim’s smartphone at KRW 1,00,000 in the luxgal road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement of D or E;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of a receipt, CCTV confirmation, and the date and time of crime, and attachment of CCTV extract photographs);

1. Investigation record of seizure;

1. Previous records: A written inquiry inquiry report, such as criminal records, personal identification and confinement status, and each investigation report (report on the previous dispositions and results of confirmation);

1. Habituality of the judgment: Application of damp-Recognition Acts and subordinate statutes in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the number of crimes, and the same kind of crimes in the instant case committed several times within the short period after release;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow