The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Sentencing sentencing on the gist of reasons for appeal

2. The lower court determined the sentence (six months of imprisonment) by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s confessions and reflects the Defendant’s crime; (b) the victim did not want the Defendant’s punishment under the agreement with the victims; (c) the degree of deceptions is not less light; (d) the amount of damage is significant; and (e) the Defendant committed fraud again during the same repeated offense period; and (e) other factors of sentencing as indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime.

The grounds for the court below's improper sentencing alleged by the defendant appear to have been sufficiently considered in determining the punishment against the defendant, and the above conditions of sentencing changed otherwise.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below is determined to be reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.

Defendant

The argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.