Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Around August 2014, the Defendant: (a) was the title of “proving the thickness of the number of residents”; (b) the deposit that is announced in the last page of the specifications of adding management expenses to be issued each month is the remaining amount after paying taxes and personnel expenses to residents in addition to management expenses and the deposit is the most miscellaneous income; and (c) the purpose of use is determined and the deposit is not absolutely used without the consent of the residents.

Until now, the occupants have the same property as Almatop, which has been collected at two percent of one percentage.

In addition, money that is clear for financing and use should be used with the consent of the residents, but this procedure was neglected and used in mind, and the property near 200 million won was put up for several months.

The amount of KRW 99,58,676, which had been up to six months, deposited with the head of the Tong, and even yet C has used the representative meeting office as an individual office, and C still has used the representative meeting office as an individual office, and it is being executed as a personal Spatiality without notifying the resident's thickness with the resident's property.

Along with the production of a printed material “,” it was distributed to the occupants of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment at that time.

However, the victim C held office as the representative director of the tenant representative of the above D apartment house and executed the restoration work on the rooftop park and related litigation costs through a resolution of the tenant representative council, but did not arbitrarily executed the deposit, disregarding the relevant procedures. The funds for the appropriation of sports facilities was deposited in the regular gold account, but the maturity of which comes, but was transferred to a separate bank ordinary deposit account on July 3, 2014, and did not reach the funds.

Nevertheless, the defendant injured the victim's reputation by openly pointing out false facts as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The respective legal statements of C and E;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant (C.