The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (2.5 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant is an initial crime that acknowledges all of the instant crimes and reflects the wrong and has no record of criminal punishment.

However, under Article 2 subparag. 8 of the Music Industry Promotion Act, the Defendant, “D” on February 22, 2016, refers to the business of planning, producing, or reproducing sound records, music files, music video works, and music video files.

In light of the fact that the Music Industry Promotion Act regulates the singing practice room business more strictly than the music and video production business in consideration of the fact that the music practice room business has a greater impact on public health, morals, and the safety of the people than the music and video production business, it is necessary to strictly punish the restriction of the singing practice room business by reporting or registering another type of business, such as the production of relatively weak music and video products, in substance after reporting or registering it with another type of business, such as the production of substantially weak music and video products.

The period and scale of the defendant's operation of a non-registered singing practice room are relatively small.

In full view of such circumstances and other circumstances as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, period, means and consequence of the crime, etc., various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.