Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a D 14 tons truck.

On March 2, 2015, the Defendant driven the above truck at around 09:00, and moved bypass the intersection of the amamspherb in the direction of the amspherb in the direction of the amspherb in the direction of the amspherb in the direction of the amspherb in the direction of the amspherb of the amspherb.

In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to take the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering gear and other devices.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to discover the bicycles of the victim E (70) who was driving in the direction of Busan in the direction of Kim Sea along three lanes from the 3-lane in the direction of Busan in the direction of Kim Sea, and got the victim and the bicycle to go over to the front part of the left part of the truck of the defendant, and led the victim and the bicycle to go back to the rear wheels.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the above occupational negligence by causing the death of the brain ties from the workplace.

Summary of Evidence

The defendant asserts that there was no fault on the part of the defendant's court's report on traffic accident in the police statement report, the actual condition investigation report, and the photo-related video-related interview report [the defendant and his defense counsel] that there was no fault on the defendant due to an accident occurred by the victim's bicycle

However, there is a negligence that the injured person was negligent in driving along the road.

In light of the following circumstances, the accident of this case was caused by force majeure, according to the above evidence adopted and examined by this court (in particular, No. 7 video clips stored in accident video CDs):

not be deemed to have been negligent in the occurrence of an accident

Since it can be sufficiently recognized, we do not accept the arguments of the defendant and his defense counsel.

(1) Car trucks.