A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 19, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s case, such as the Suwon District Court No. 111, the Suwon District Court No. 2014, J. 4797, J., F, and the forgery of private documents and the use of the investigation documents, etc., which were located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon District Court No. 111, the Defendant issued a false statement contrary to memory and perjury as follows.

In fact, the Defendant’s “Agreement on the Promotion of Joint Projects” dated October 2006, the name of the Defendant and the name of 20 other than the Defendant, with the consent of the Defendant, was a true document written by the Suwon District Court 2012, together with the consent of the Defendant, at the E’s house immediately before the civil action No. 18963, and the authenticity was immediately recognized during the process of the above civil action. However, despite the well-known fact that E did not forge it, the witness was affixed and sealed on the agreement on the Promotion of Joint Projects.

“I will not answer the question of the defense counsel.”

The answer to “(in civil procedure)” and “(in civil procedure, the witness)” are prepared by the witness for the joint project promotion agreement, but the certificate of land status has been forged.

The defense counsel’s question of “outstanding” was also forged for the attorney-at-law’s confirmation of the status of the land in question.

The agreement on the promotion of joint projects was also finitely finite, and there was no finite.

The answer to "the list of the documentary evidence of civil procedure" and the attorney-at-law of the witness and witness at the date of the above pleading that the agreement for the promotion of the joint project is not forged and is not genuine.

I did not reach the question of the defense counsel “I”.

It may be known that the lawyer went beyond his match because only forged was concentrated.

The author clearly stated that the author had a clear knowledge of the resistance.

H. He had made.

The answer is that the witness presents a joint investment agreement when the other investors reach the E’s house immediately before the receipt of the complaint for a civil action.