beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 7,125,00 for the Plaintiff (Appointed Party); KRW 6,974,477 for the Appointed C; KRW 2,135,005 for the Appointed D; and
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the building located in the Gunsan City G (hereinafter “instant building”). The Selection C leased the instant building and operated the cafeteria of the trade name of H, the Selection D leased the instant building, and the Selection F leased the instant building and operated the cafeteria of the trade name of J, and the Selection E leased the instant building and operated the loss of the trade name of K.
B. On March 3, 2013, around 16:00, a fire occurred in the instant building, and the equipment and interior facilities of the store operated by the designated parties were destroyed.
(hereinafter “instant fire”). C.
The Defendant employed Vietnam L from March 3, 2013 to 14:00 to 15:00, the instant fire occurred, and had the Defendant take part in the Defendant’s workplace located after the instant building, which was located after the instant building, to cut off the number of trees.
L put trees into the iron sheet box, put fire into the iron sheet box, finished work according to the defendant's direction, put out the fire, and laid down the trees contained in the iron sheet.
Since then, L had been placed in the vicinity of the building, and the building of the commercial building was adjacent to the building, and the weather was clear, dry and winded, but it was put in timber and waste, etc. in the vicinity of the building, without properly checking whether it was completely cut off. Moreover, among the building of this case, the summary order of KRW 2,000,000 was finalized due to criminal facts that “The building of this case destroyed the real estate and movable property in an amount of KRW 10,00,000 at the market price, which is the second door of the J Lestop and the first door of the J Lestop and the H Lesp, and the first door of the building of this case, which are moved successively to the H Lesp to the upper end of the building of this case.”
(A) On July 29, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2423, hereinafter referred to as "the ground for recognition"). 【The fact that there is no dispute, the entries or images of evidence A Nos. 1 through 9, and the purport of the entire pleadings.