logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.09.11 2013고단1816 (1)
특정범죄자에대한보호관찰및전자장치부착등에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 27, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment, and five years of order to attach an electronic tracking device at Seoul High Court on January 27, 201, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on February 8, 2011, and completed the execution of imprisonment in the port prison on November 3, 2012.

From November 3, 2012, the Defendant had a duty to attach an electronic device pursuant to Article 9(1) and (3) of the Act on Probation and Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Offenders and to utilize an electronic device pursuant to Article 14 of the same Act and Article 11 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, the obligation of a person subject to attachment to complete sexual assault treatment programs pursuant to Article 9-2(1) of the same Act, the obligation to complete sexual assault treatment programs, the obligation to perform the matters to be observed pursuant to Article 32 of the Probation, etc. Act faithfully.

1. On January 11, 2013, from around 03:48 to 04:06, the Defendant, who violated the duty of a person wearing an electronic device and the duty of using an electronic device, has impaired the utility of the electronic device on nine occasions in total, including the fact that the Defendant was missing a portable signal signal signal at Suwon-si C, Suwon-si, for eight minutes.

2. On January 23, 2013, the Defendant violated his/her duty to comply with the rules imposed on the person subject to the attachment of an electronic device by failing to attend the sexual assault treatment program conducted by the Suwon Probation Education Office at the Suwon-si 190-1, Suwon-si, 190-1, and by failing to attend the sexual assault treatment program conducted by the Suwon Probation Office at around January 30, 2013; around February 20, 2013; around February 27, 2013; and around February 27, 2013; and around March 6, 2013, the Defendant violated the rules imposed on the person subject to the attachment of the electronic device without justifiable grounds.

Pursuant to Article 9(1) and (3) of the Act on the Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders from November 3, 2012, the Defendant “2013 Highest 1834” means the obligation of a person wearing an electronic device to attach the electronic device, and the obligation to use the electronic device, pursuant to Article 14 of the said Act and Article 11 of the Enforcement Decree of the said Act.

arrow