A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered the convenience store located in the Gu of Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) made it difficult for the Defendant to have avoided any disturbance, such as requesting an employee to “money” at the place under the influence of alcohol; and (c) reported to 112 persons around the witness.

The police officer affiliated with the police station in the Jinnam Sea, who was called upon the above report, listened to the circumstances of the case from the above employee, and instructed the defendant to return home while moving out of the convenience store, and used the above D's face face to take one time by hand, and used the above D's face part by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) that the defendant has been led to confession and reflect, the defendant has the record of punishing the same kind of fine on one occasion around 2010), but there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime or violence thereafter, damage