logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2013.04.18 2013노107
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(강간등치상)등
Text

Defendant

In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Part of the defendant's case

A. Summary of the grounds for appeal 1) Defendant and the person to whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “Defendant”).

(2) In light of the various sentencing conditions in the instant case, the sentence imposed by the lower court (12 years of imprisonment, 120 hours of order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) is too unreasonable. (2) The sentence imposed by the lower court in light of the various sentencing conditions in the instant case by the prosecutor is too uneasible and unreasonable.

B. The judgment of the court below committed the crime of this case, which is the same kind of crime in five months or less since the defendant had been sentenced to imprisonment three times due to rape, injury, rape, etc. The defendant committed the crime of this case. The crime of this case was committed in light of the circumstances, contents and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., which are extremely poor in quality in light of the crime of this case, the victim also suffered severe mental suffering from the crime of this case, and the defendant committed the crime of this case, which is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as where the defendant was placed with an electronic tracking device, and where the victim was faced by marbling knife and threatened with the victim's knife at a low level, and thus, attempted rape and attempted rape. The crime of this case was committed in violation of the crime of this case. The court below committed the crime of this case, which is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the crime of this case, the crime of this case's punishment of this case, and the crime of this case's punishment of this case.

Therefore, the defendant and prosecutor's argument of unfair sentencing is justified.

arrow