beta
Text
1. Defendant who exceeds the following amount among the part of the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment in the judgment of the first instance.
Reasons
1. The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, and 3.
On July 6, 2012, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer for the land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”), which was owned by the Defendant, based on sale in the J, and thereafter the J completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the instant land on August 16, 2016, on August 16, 2016.
B. On the ground of the instant land, the buildings indicated in the attached Table, which were unregistered buildings constructed by the Defendant with a building permit granted on August 1, 201 (hereinafter “instant building”) are located.
C. Meanwhile, the amount equivalent to the rent for the portion of 8,042/11,515 shares among the 8,042/11,515 shares among the 1,336 square meters of E forest among the 670 square meters of inside Dong-dong, Dong-si, which is adjacent to the instant land, is 1,870,701 won per month in the year of 2015.
According to the above facts of the judgment on the ground of the claim on February 2, 199, the defendant is obligated to remove the building of this case and deliver the land of this case, which is the site, to the plaintiff and the selected party I upon the plaintiff's claim for the removal of interference by the ownership of the land of this case.
Furthermore, the defendant owned the building of this case and obtained profits equivalent to rent without any legal ground as to the land of this case, which is the land of this case, and suffered damages equivalent to that of this case from the plaintiff and the designated parties I. Thus, the defendant is the plaintiff and the designated parties I, and as the plaintiff seeks from August 16, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the land of this case from August 16, 2016 to the date of acquisition of ownership of the land of this case by the plaintiff and the designated parties I, the amount equivalent to rent of KRW 90,00 won = 1.870,70,701 per month and the amount equivalent to rent of the adjoining land of this case is 1,870,701 won around 2015, the area of adjoining land of