1. The Intervenor’s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are borne by the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

purport.

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1) The Plaintiff is the C University (hereinafter “instant University”).

2) On March 1, 2013, the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) was newly appointed as a new professor for the tourism management of the University of this case and a concurrent professor, and was promoted to the former assistant professor on September 3, 2014.

B. On July 14, 2014, the instant university entered into an agreement on the specialized junior college promotion project between the instant university and the Korea Research Foundation with the Korea Research Foundation on July 14, 2014, and the Intervenor entered into an agreement on the promotion project of specialized junior colleges. The Intervenor took charge of the actual operation of DNA-based field learning and job learning programs promoted as part of the said project (D; hereinafter “D”).

C. On August 27, 2015, the Plaintiff’s president demanded a resolution on disciplinary action against the Intervenor on August 27, 2015, following the grounds for disciplinary action: ① the Intervenor’s inappropriate operation of the D-based on-site learning and job learning programs; ② the Intervenor paid excessive expenses; ③ the amount of national treasury subsidies in 2015; ③ the reduction of the 2015 government subsidies; and the fluor’s image of the instant university; ④ the Intervenor’s false entry of the industrial career period at the time of submission of the documents supporting employment.

Plaintiff

On November 24, 2015, the Plaintiff’s Disciplinary Committee decided to dismiss the Intervenor. 1) On November 24, 2015, the Plaintiff’s Disciplinary Committee decided to dismiss the Intervenor based on the grounds for disciplinary action as follows. On October 1, 201, the Plaintiff’s Disciplinary Committee decided to dismiss the Intervenor. On May 18, 2004, the Plaintiff’s personal history was falsely stated as if the Plaintiff had worked for the hotel E (i.e., the period from October 27, 2001 to May 7, 2004) and interfered with the fair appointment process by stating that the Plaintiff had worked for 12 months.

2. The intervenor who is a professor of the principal school and who is involved in the principal school.