Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 2014, the Defendant was ordered to close down the family of children D with the Defendant at a governmental correctional institution located in the Kusan-dong of the Government of the Republic of Korea with the Defendant, “The family of children D operated by the wife in the Republic of Korea was ordered to suspend the license of the president of the family of children D.

How should be?

Hearing the statement to the effect that it is “,” and there are many public officials who are going to know on the side of the strike.

We look at whether the administrative disposition can be mitigated after the release of the inmate.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

On June 3, 2014, the Defendant decided to substitute C with a penalty surcharge when he saw C a public official who was working in his fluence at a fluent place.

The suspension of business is not likely to bring about a problem.

C. (D) The license suspension disposition has been in favor of the maximum extent, and thus has given a mind.

“A” sending a false letter to the effect that “A” is false, and on the 13th of the same month, the victim D, who is the wife of C, need to bear the cost of making the public officials in charge of entertainment and route to reduce the administrative disposition related to child-care centers operated by the party, by posting a telephone to the victim D.

A false statement was made to the effect that “money was remitted to a designated account.”

However, the Defendant was unaware of the public official who was dispatched, and even if he received money from the victim D, he was thought to use it for personal purposes, such as living expenses, etc., without using it as the contact or street funds. Therefore, the Defendant did not have the intention or ability to reduce the administrative disposition related to the collection of children's house of the victim's D upon solicitation to the public official of the agency in the case of

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was transferred from the victim to the Korean bank account (Account Number: E) of the name of the defendant to the victim, respectively, KRW 1 million on June 13, 2014 and KRW 300,000 on June 27, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to receive property, and at the same time, is a public official.