logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.05.18 2016고단3502
사기등
Text

1. Defendant A’s imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of ten months, Defendant C’s imprisonment of one year, and Defendant D’s fine.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Defendants A, C, and D’s joint crimes are those who are not medical personnel.

On February 2, 2014, the Defendants: (a) in fact, even when Defendant A and Defendant C operated one Council member, the Defendants, as if Defendant D operated one Council member under the name of Defendant D; (b) opened one Council member under the name of Defendant D; and (c) filed a claim for medical care benefits with the National Health Insurance Corporation as if the medical personnel operated the National Health Insurance Corporation as a normal cause.

(a) No person, other than a medical person violating the Medical Service Act, may establish a medical institution;

Nevertheless, according to the above mother’s contents from February 4, 2014 to December 17, 2014, the Defendants established medical facilities such as treatment rooms, sugar rooms, water treatment rooms, hospitalization rooms, etc. on the 2, 3, and the 4th floor of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, H, 2 to 4th floor of the 2, 3, and the 4th floor of Ansan-si. Defendant D provided treatment to unspecified patients at the 9 million won monthly wage and for the said period.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to establish a medical institution by Defendant A and Defendant C, not a medical personnel.

(b) Only a medical care institution, such as a medical institution established pursuant to the Medical Service Act, may claim reimbursement of expenses for medical care to the Service, and where a person who is not entitled to establish a medical institution hires an oriental medical doctor to provide medical care, he/she may not claim expenses for medical care under the National

Nevertheless, on February 4, 2014, according to the above mother’s contents, the Defendants established the above “I” “I” by Defendant A and Defendant C, and employed Defendant D to treat the patients as above. However, even if Defendant D provided medical treatment by opening the above I’s clinic, Defendant D was performing the same as if Defendant D provided medical treatment.

arrow