logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2017.05.11 2017고단96
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

1. The punishment of the accused shall be one year;

2.Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 25, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of three million won for a violation of road traffic law in the Daejeon District Court's red support on June 25, 2007, and on December 18, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, etc. in the same court on December 18, 2007, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of road traffic law on more than two occasions.

On January 20, 2017, at around 17:50, the Defendant driven a D 2.1 ton truck under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.084% at a 12km section from the front of the Defendant’s dwelling in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group C to the front of the 12km-ro 1:00-gil, Jin-gu, Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, Seoul, to the front of the convenience store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Previous convictions: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (Attachment to such previous rulings, etc.);

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of and Order to Attend, repeated the driving of drinking, even though he/she had a record of being punished for driving under drinking.

The defendant lacks the awareness of compliance seriously.

I seem to appear.

Although the defendant should be punished strictly, the defendant is expected to be aware of through the implementation of an order to observe the protection, observe the order, and attend the lecture in consideration of the details leading to the driving of the case, driving distance, alcohol concentration, etc. revealed in the public trial and investigation records, and finally, the defendant will be faced with the order, and the punishment shall be determined like the order.

arrow