A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 30, 2012, at around 07:00, the Defendant carried waste, such as newspaper sites, in front of the bridge of D High School in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and spreaded red frame on the advertising bulletin board, and reported the Defendant to the victim E (75 years of age) who read “I fright, fright, and scars away from the advertising board”, “I am the victim’s face with plastic mortar (90cm in length) dangerous things to the victim E (75 years of age), and changed the victim’s face into the land by pusheding the victim’s body, flicking the victim’s eye above the victim’s body, flick, and knife the victim’s eye so that the victim’s eye needs to be treated for about two weeks.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A medical certificate of injury, and each photograph;

1. Each investigation report [The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was in a state of mental disability of grade III at the time of the crime in this case, so the records show that the defendant was in a state of mental disability of grade III at the time of the crime in this case, but it does not seem that the defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of the crime in this case, in light of various circumstances such as the circumstance leading to the crime in this case, the method and method of the crime in this case, and the defendant's behavior before and after the crime in this case. Thus, the defendant and

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation seems to have been led to the confession of a crime by the defendant and to repent of his mistake through the living under confinement, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the victim does not have any criminal record other than the punishment of a fine due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act in around 197, and the victim's injury.