logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2019.08.29 2019고단1655
전자금융거래법위반
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be three million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall engage in any act of lending any means of access to electronic financial transactions while demanding, demanding or promising the compensation therefor.

Nevertheless, around March 8, 2019, the Defendant listened to the statement that “B will give a loan if you send the e-mail card for the purpose of interest and principal withdrawal,” from a person who misrepresented the borrower’s staff member, and issued the e-mail card and password connected to the D (Account Number: E) account in the name of the Defendant through Kwikset service article on the front day of the 17:00 side of the e-mail-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

As a result, the Defendant promised to lend the means of access to electronic financial transactions in return for intangible expectation interest that can receive future loans.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on transfer;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the means of access leased by the accused has been used for telecommunications-based financial fraud, the scale of damage caused thereby, the means of access in this case cannot be deemed to have been used for telecommunications-based financial fraud crime, the number of means of access to which the means of access is newly established, the defendant's benefits from the crime in this case, the existence of the defendant's benefits from the crime in this case, the same crime has no record of punishment, the confession of the defendant and the truth-finding are divided, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the argument in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be

arrow