The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes again during the period of repeated crime even though there were very many records of punishment for the same kind of crime, taking into account the circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable even considering the fact that the Defendant led to the confession of the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.