1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) 61.20 square meters of cement block C ground block block slive roof in Western-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoanan-gu.

1. Basic facts

A. From around 1993, the Plaintiff leased to Dong E the land of 193 square meters of D forest land in Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Incheon (hereinafter “D land”) and 167 square meters of C forest land in Seobuk-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Incheon (hereinafter “C land”).

The network E (hereinafter “D building”) on the land above D around 1993, around 1993, constructed a cement brick structure and a red brick brick structure and a 83.26 square meters of a single-story house on the D’s land above D’s land (hereinafter “D’), and completed the registration of preservation of ownership on the land under the name of P’s own on March 31, 1993, by constructing a cement block structure and a 61.20 square meters of a single-story house on the land above C’s land, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoul, and C’s cement block structure and a 49.90 square meters of a single-story house (hereinafter “DC building”) on D’s land and some of D’s land.

B. On December 20, 1999, the network E completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of donation on D and D buildings to the Defendant, his father, and on December 6, 1999.

C. On January 15, 2008, the Plaintiff newly renewed the existing lease agreement with respect to the network E and land, and the main contents of the contract are as follows.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff newly concluded a lease contract with the content of the network E or the Defendant and D land at that time.

[ table] Details of a lease agreement concluded on January 15, 2008 - Rent: one million won per annum (payment date on December 31 of each year): Two years - The unpaid time limit on two or more occasions shall be regarded as terminating the contract, and the rent shall be adjusted on the basis of the officially announced value of the relevant year.

The network E died on April 1, 2009.

On April 30, 2009, the defendant among co-inheritors reported the qualified acceptance, and the remaining co-inheritors reported the renunciation of inheritance on the same day, and each of the above reports was accepted and confirmed.

E. The details of the rent that the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff in relation to each of the above land lease are as follows.