beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and fine of 6,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment of 8 months and fine of 6,00,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person operating a remote area exporter E, and the defendant B is a person entrusted with the export of a remote area by the defendant A.
The Defendants conspired to report the quantity of the remote area exported to China at the request of F in charge of Chinese customs clearance, which is less than the actual quantity.
1. Any person who violates the Customs Duties Act (hereinafter referred to as "dumping") shall, when he intends to export, import or return goods, file a report thereon with the head of the relevant customs office;
Nevertheless, around June 9, 201, the Defendants conspired to export the remote area E in the name of Incheon Customs and reported 706 gamblings, 14,120km to the Incheon Customs and sealed 234 gamblings in a remote area without reporting 234 gamblings, 7,968km (the cost of goods is KRW 28,087,020) in a way that they omitted 234 gamblings, 7,968km (the cost of goods is KRW 28,020) in a way that they reported 32 times from that time to April 10, 201, and sealed 8,140 boxes, 223,523km (the cost of goods is KRW 454,102,460) in the above way.
2. No person who violates the Customs Act (including a false declaration) shall not file a declaration or file a false declaration on the name, standard, etc. of the goods when he/she files an export, import or return declaration;
Nevertheless, around May 31, 201, the Defendants conspired to export remote areas in the name of Incheon Customs office 679 gamblings, 13,580km and reported false information as if they were exported 612 boxes, 8,250km (the cost of goods KRW 13,586,930) in the name of the Incheon Customs office and filed a false report on the quantity of remote areas and the weight thereof in total from around 12 times to April 12, 2012 as shown in the attached list 2 of the crime committed.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Legal statement of the witness B;
1. The prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants (including the whole part) 1.