The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. It is difficult to see that the amount of damage to the instant crime is very significant, and the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected is favorable.

On the other hand, the criminal records of the defendant are several times, and in 2018, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months for the same crime and was serving as a repeated offender at the time of the instant case, and the fact that the defendant again went to commit the instant crime is disadvantageous.

In addition, considering the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.