beta
Text
1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 95,890,550 and KRW 50,000 among them, the Defendant shall pay KRW 95,890,550 from May 28, 2012 to KRW 45,890,550.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. (1) On May 28, 2012, C driving a D-si vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 14:45 on May 28, 2012, and proceeding between the two sides of the road at the entrance of the village where the direction of the road is located in the one-dong, one-dong, Sincheon-si, into the intersection of the road.
In order to be a U.S., while driving a U.S.-turn with the side outside of the road, the plaintiff A driven by the same direction and followed by the plaintiff A. Accordingly, the above plaintiff A suffered an injury, such as the anti-cirrosis.
(2) The Plaintiff B is the mother of the Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is a mutual aid project operator who has concluded a mutual aid agreement with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damage suffered by the plaintiff A due to the accident of this case as a mutual aid business operator of defendant vehicle.
C. According to the evidence of this case, the following facts are as follows: (a) Plaintiff A was proceeding on the road of one lane in front of the Defendant vehicle; (b) Defendant A was going beyond the lane in order to drive on one occasion by using the space on the right side road between the intersection and the intersection; (c) Defendant A did not completely deviate from the lane; and (d) Defendant A was exempted from the lane in excess of half of the body of the vehicle; (c) Plaintiff A was proceeding on the left side of the Defendant vehicle in order to overtake the vehicle by using a space outside the lane; and (d) Plaintiff A was proceeding on the left side of the vehicle in order to drive the vehicle in front; and (d) Plaintiff A went into the intersection and went into the intersection; and (e) Plaintiff A went into the intersection with Defendant A’s vehicle in conflict with the direction toward the left side of the lane in order to avoid shock.