beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On February 16, 2017, at around 01:23, the Defendant received 112 reports that domestic violence occurred in front of the Seoul Western-gu, Seoul, and dispatched to the site, from the police box D belonging to the Seoul Southern-gu Police Station C commander of the Seoul Southern-gu Police Station: (a) the Defendant continued to be sleeped even if he received the demand that “the other persons be able to sleep and be able to do so; (b) the police box D was issued to the Defendant with a request for adjudication (e.g., creating unstables), and (c) the police box D was issued with a request for adjudication to the Defendant.
Along with the desire of “Isker I,” the cellular phone cited by his hand was displayed as if they were frightening D with a light, and was sealed by his finger D with the face of the light frighting D with his hand.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the 112 reporting processing, which is a legitimate official duty of police officers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, the facts and contents of the crime in this case, etc., the defendant has been subject to punishment once the same crime as this case, and several times of violence crimes. Meanwhile, the defendant confessions and reflects the crime in this case, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment after September 2009, and the defendant has no record of criminal punishment after September 2009, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in light of the overall circumstances and sentencing guidelines shown in the records and changes theory of this case.