The judgment below

The remainder other than the confiscated part shall be reversed.

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than eight months.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, on November 2018, aware of the fact that he was involved in the phishing crime by carrying out the role of delivering his string card to a policeman at the early stage, and was aware that prior to that, he would deliver documents, etc. to the Korea Inclusive and Finance Agency.

Therefore, as to the charge of violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act on October 30, 2018 (the remainder of the charge No. 2, excluding the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act on December 3, 2018), among the charges, the Defendant did not have any intention or intention for joint processing.

Nevertheless, the court below found all of the charges guilty, and the judgment of the court below in this part is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. Each sentence (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) imposed by the court below on the Defendants (the defendants) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 피고인 A의 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 ▣ 성명불상자와의 사기 공동범행(원심 판시 범죄사실 제1의 나항) 피고인은 G을 통해 알게 된 서민금융진흥원 직원을 사칭하는 성명불상자(일명 ‘F’)의 지시에 따라 성명불상자로부터 체크카드를 수령하여 인출책에게 전달해 주면 기본수당과 택시비, 거리에 따라 추가수당을 지급해주겠다는 내용의 제안을 받고 이를 수락한 후 성명불상자의 지시에 따라 마치 그 업체에서 보낸 택배 기사인 것처럼 행세하면서 위 체크카드를 수령하여 B 등에게 전달하는 역할을 하기로 하고, B은 H을 통해 알게 된 I 직원을 사칭하는 성명불상자(일명 ‘F’)의 지시에 따라 다른 인출책으로부터 체크카드를 수령하여 성명불상자의 지시에 따라 현금을 인출하면...