The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the owner of the land, building, and E in Sung-nam-si, was introduced with H (ju), which is a steel distributor through F and G, under the circumstances that the Defendant was unable to repay the collateral security obligation equivalent to KRW 3.2 billion established on the said land and building, and it was difficult to bear the interest.

The Defendant provided the above land and buildings as collateral to the Steel Wholesale Co., Ltd., and received steel supply as a result of the sales business, and agreed to pay interest on the collateral obligation established in preference to the above land and buildings with the proceeds of the sales business. On January 3, 2014, the Defendant signed and sealed the agreement on the establishment of the collateral security and the agreement on the establishment of the collateral security to set up the maximum amount of KRW 3 billion on the above land and buildings at the office of K Certified Judicial Scriveners in Seocho-gu, Seoul, and signed and sealed the collateral security amount of KRW 3 billion on the same land and buildings, and accordingly, the K Certified Judicial Scriveners set up the maximum amount of KRW 3 billion on the above land and buildings at Dong Young-gu (State).

Nevertheless, around March 11, 2014, the Defendant prepared a written complaint stating that “In collusion with the Defendant, I, F, and G for the purpose of having a criminal punishment imposed upon him/her, I, F, and G, the Defendant created a collateral security by forging a modified district D land and building and E land in the name of the complainant, and by forging a written contract for establishing a collateral security on the building and E land under the name of the complainant.” On March 11, 2014, the Defendant submitted the said written complaint to the person in charge at the Do-nam branch office of the Suwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office of Suwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office (Seoul District Public Prosecutor’s Office) on March 11, 2014, submitted the written complaint to the person in charge, and made a statement to supplement the written complaint at the Police Station of the Gyeonggi District Public Prosecutor’s Office on March 24, 2014,

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the witness M in the fourth public trial protocol;

1. Statement made by the witness I in the eight-time public trial records;

1. A complaint;