logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.10 2015노677
전자금융거래법위반
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the deposit passbook, etc. transferred by the Defendant was used for the actual crime of fraud, resulting in the occurrence of a victim is disadvantageous.

However, the defendant has led to confession and reflect on the crime.

It is an initial crime with no record of crime, and there was no particular benefit from the crime of this case.

In addition, considering the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the age and behavior environment of the defendant and the circumstances before and after the crime, the sentence of the court below against the defendant is somewhat inappropriate.

3. The decision of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 346(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act as the defendant's appeal is reasonable, and the judgment below is reversed and it is again decided as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and the facts charged against the defendant recognized by the court and the summary of the evidence are the same as the corresponding columns of the judgment below, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and the choice of punishment, respectively, Articles 49 (4) 1 and 6 (3) 1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow