Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won, and a fine of 300,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:00 on January 26, 2013, the Defendants, under the influence of alcohol in front of the National Agricultural Cooperative, the Suchip 2, Suwon-si, Suchip, Suwon-si, the Defendant, along with two influences in name and influence, was to arrive in the Suwon Station, the destination of which is the destination.

On the same day, at around 23:10 on the same day, he / she arrived at the taxi platform in front of the Suwon Station 18 at the same time, and raised a complaint that the victim did not get the 1 driver's first to board the taxi platform in front of the Suwon Station 18, and Defendant A was able to have the victim's face one time by the hand hand hand of the defendant A, and Defendant B used the victim, such as plucking, plucking, etc. of the victim who gets the clothes of the defendant B to escape.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted bodily injury on the part of the victim, such as the inner part, the injury of the 14-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Some of the police interrogation protocol against the Defendants (including D substitutes)

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the punishment of crimes;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on the Defendants and their defense counsel’ assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendant A asserts to the effect that the victim’s face was solely flicked, and the victim’s face was not found, and Defendant B only plicked, and spreaded, and spreaded.

2. We examine the judgment, and the victim D’s legal statement consistent with the facts constituting the crime in the judgment does not unilaterally provide the Defendants with an unfavorable statement, but is a favorable statement to the Defendant B.